Citation: Frederic Jameson () Reification and utopia in mass culture. Social Text, Duke University Press (RSS). Download. To begin, though, it is necessary to clarify Jameson’s and Deleuze’s arguments. In “Reification and Utopia in Mass Culture,” Jameson directs. “In the final section of his essay, Jameson talks much about artistic The theory of mass culture-or mass audience culture, commercial culture.

Author: Dainos Tojarr
Country: Paraguay
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Business
Published (Last): 11 December 2014
Pages: 355
PDF File Size: 2.79 Mb
ePub File Size: 9.43 Mb
ISBN: 891-4-28916-283-2
Downloads: 72190
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Kajit

We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. It is true that manipulation theory sometimes finds a special place in its scheme for those rare cultural objects which can be said to have overt political and social content: This is not the place to raise the complicated problem of political art today, except to say that our business as culture critics requires us to raise it, and to rethink what are still essentially 30s categories in some new and more satisfactory contemporary way.

Jameson I initially read this quote as a praise of political art as so worthy an object of study that its complexities could not be fully addressed within the scope of Jamesons work.

“In Reification and Utopia in Mass Culture” by Frederick Jameson Essay Example for Free

In other words, Jameson was humbly admitting that political art is deserving of its own hameson analysis. Why, though, is Jameson incapable of addressing political art and implicitly counter culture for more than a page in his nineteen page essay describing modern culture?

cultuge As I reread the quote, I began to hear a dismissive tone in the words special place and rare. How rare is overt political and social content?

How rare are 60s protest songs? While the historicity of the category 60s can be appreciated, jamespn indeed Jamesons use of it appears to be grounded in skepticism towards the authenticity of political art emerging outside of collective life, it seems as if Jameson is using it to contain a threat to his argument.

The threat, that is, that overt political art and action have been present and overt since before the s, and continue to persist now. I feel that, to a significant extent, his position as academic shields him from and allows him to theorize away a counterculture that has been very much alive and struggling.

The production or assumption of a limited period of the 60s tends to perpetuate a nostalgic distance from a period of political art, counterculture, and resistance that never really ended or began. In many ways the 60s have come to resemble a safe countercultural commodity. One can easily find coffee table books on the collective rebellious phase of the baby cuulture youth, or one can watch the Wonder Years or Forest Gump and recall a period before choosing to turn off, tune out, drop in.


Just a few blocks away museum visitors, reificatino they to instead choose to visit the Tower City Mall at public square on a Sunday, would likely encounter middle class kids and homeless people dissolving cultural boundaries at Cleveland Food Not Bombs. I dont propose, in response, a hasty rejection of some mythically totalitarian historical metanarrative, but rather I propose a more complete and honest history that dissolves the nostalgic distance between political art then and recuperated art culturr.

Unfortunately for Jameson, who has chosen to ignore the reality of such a history for the sake of a commentary on his own constructed meta-society, many posts examples easily come to mind. The punk rock movement, certainly with a strong collective component, produced material easily accessible to mass culture. The Sex Pistols Anarchy in the U. Rage Against the Machine, arguably one of the more important alternative bands of the s, initiated a radical Axis of Justice with System of a Down and donated all of its proceeds from a tour with U2 to organizations as overtly resistant as EZLN.

Reification and utopia in mass culture

Any middle class adolescent who frequented Ozzfest or other metal festivals in the s and s is likely aware of System of a Downs Steal This Album, or the lyrics to their politically charged Prison Song.

Someone interested in hip hop enough to scratch the surface will likely encounter KRS-1s Sound of da Police released in And Radiohead, now international superstars, have just released their latest album essentially for free, bypassing the music industry entirely.

Jameson might respond to me with a question like, yes, but why havent they worked? My answer to such a question would be precisely my historical point: Jameson cannot escape his own position within consumer capitalism in that it is his choice to perceive a large body of political art as contained within a diluted dialectic that imposes itself upon consumers.

And besides, this is not to mention the countless DIY zines circulating around Infoshops, in radical circles, and across the hipster-radical bridge in trendy coffee shops.

A nice account of posts anarchist praxis can be found in criminologist Jeff Ferrells Tearing Down the Streets: Adventures in Urban Anarchy, where he discusses his own experiences with collective activities as obverse as pirate radio, graffiti, and biking in critical masses. But are these practices reivication

Perhaps only to those who continue to ignore, dismiss, and keep a distance from them. Well, this is not the place to raise the complicated problem of countercultural elitism and exclusion. For the rest of the items on Jamesons list, it appears as if ajd has chosen examples that fit his argument of rarity.

  EO 13388 PDF

Perhaps my own ignorance is to blame for my unfamiliarity with the rest of the items utlpia Jamesons list. If this is the case, how is it that I was able to come up with several examples of my own? Are they simply inauthentic, easily recuperated, or not overt enough?

Am I a crazy radical detached from the revolutionary potentiality of mass culture? Or are my examples invalidated and recuperated precisely at the moment that Jamesons attitude of disengagement and struggle for theoretical security reposition them inside of some abstract near-omnipresent nightmare? But does the myth of the rarity of genuine and overt political art- and resistance in general- honestly acknowledge a totalizing or nearly totalizing condition like Guy Debords spectacle or Eeification Mumfords megamachine, or does it merely reveal its proponents inability or refusal to engage with political art and action of their contemporary im To what extent does a fear of recuperation reproduce precisely the distance required for recuperation?

The ideological component of Jamesons writing comes to bear in his own language: Rsification we directly engage in overt political art or action, however, the University can only have us, as rare historical events, in retrospect. Tearing Down The Streets: Adventures in Urban Anarchy. New York, New York.

Accessed December 31, Leave your email and we will send you an example after 24 hours If you contact us after hours, cultre get back to you in 24 hours or less. Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one? Click to learn jamesoj https: Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website! How to cite this page Choose cite format: How about make it original?

Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website.

If you need this or any other sample, we can send it to you an email. We’ll occasionally send you account related and promo emails.

“In Reification and Utopia in Mass Culture” by Frederick Jameson Essay

Sorry, but downloading is forbidden on this website. Hi, I am Sara from Studymoose Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? Your Answer is very helpful for Us Thank you a lot!