Doublespeak (Rebel Reads) [William Lutz] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Doublespeak is the language of non-responsibility, carefully. William D. Lutz is an American linguist who specializes in the use of plain language and the avoidance of doublespeak (deceptive language). He wrote a. Doublespeak is language that deliberately obscures, disguises, distorts, or reverses the meaning of words. Doublespeak may take.
|Country:||Republic of Macedonia|
|Published (Last):||25 April 2014|
|PDF File Size:||15.61 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||11.43 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Moran highlights the structural nature of doublespeak, and notes that social institutions such as the mass media adopt an active, top-down approach in managing opinion.
Feb 23, Tory Hunz rated it it was amazing. In our time, political speech and writing are largely the defence of the indefensible … Thus political language has to consist largely of euphemism, question-begging and sheer cloudy vagueness … the great enemy of clear language is insincerity.
Jasonn Glass rated it really liked it Sep 03, Creation of necessary illusions. Orwell’s description of political speech dohblespeak extremely similar to the contemporary definition of doublespeak: Although the term is not used in the book, it is a close relative of two of the book’s central concepts, ” doublethink ” and ” Newspeak “.
Doublespeak – Wikipedia
Hugh Rank formed the Doublespeak committee and was the first chairman of this committee. Cbsd library rated it it was amazing Dec 21, Lutz uses the example of parity products: This experiment suggests certain analogies between the environments created for rats by the scientists and the environments created for us humans by language and the various mass media of communication.
Tibbetts is one of the main critics of the NCTE, claiming that “the Committee’s very approach to the misuse of language and what it calls ‘doublespeak’ may in the long run limit its usefulness”. NCTE passed two resolutions. Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. Recipients of the Orwell Award. Doublespeak may take the form of euphemisms e.
Examples of the structural nature of the use of Doublespeak have been made by modern scholars. Books by William D.
Lutz states that it is important to highlight doublespeak to the public because “language isn’t the invention of human beings to lie, deceive, mislead, and manipulate” and the “purpose of language is to communicate the truth and to facilitate social groups getting together”.
Tibbetts argues that such a relation between NCTE and Orwell’s work is contradicting because “the Committee’s attitude towards language is willjam, even radical” while “Orwell’s attitude was conservative, even reactionary”. This book showcases the doublespeak used by the government and by companies to “communicate” with the public. Donald Barlett and James B.
InLutz received his bachelor’s degree from the Dominican College of Racine which closed its doors in The Political Economy of the Mass Media that people in modern society consist of decision-makers and social participants who have to be made to agree. Herman and Noam Chomsky note in their book that Orwellian doublespeak is an important component of the manipulation of the English language in American media, through a process called “dichotomization”; a component of media propaganda involving “deeply embedded double standards in the reporting of news”.
He served as editor of its second publication, Teaching about Doublespeakwhich carried forward the Eilliam charge to inform teachers of ways of teaching students how to recognize and combat language designed to mislead and misinform.
To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.
Being himself one of the leaders of the Communist Party of Italyhis theories had, in turn, been strongly influenced by the German social thinker Karl Marxand have their ideological roots grounded in Marxist theory of false consciousness and capitalist exploitation.
The point is that in a All who use language should be concerned whether statements and facts agree, whether language is, in Orwell’s words, “largely the defense of the indefensible” and whether language “is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind”.
Kevin rated it liked it Jul 26, Where there is a gap between one’s real and one’s declared aims, one turns as it were instinctively to long words and exhausted idioms, Herman and Noam Chomsky Although the theories that premise doublespeak are still indefinite, there are some theories that have parallels with the theory of doublespeak and Orwell’s ideology in Nineteen Eighty-Four and might possibly provide a better understanding of where doublespeak’s theories could have come from.
To highlight the uniqueness of their product, advertisers may choose to market it differently from their competitors. Antonio Gramsci ‘s concepts on cultural hegemonyin particular, suggest that the culture and values of the economic elite — the bourgeoisie — become indoctrinated as “common sense” to the working-class, allowing for the maintenance of the status quo through misplaced belief.
Views Read Edit View history. It was prepared to be incorporated within a wide variety of existing programs and textbooks in English, speech, media, communications, journalism, social studies. This page was last edited on 21 Decemberat If you’ve ever wanted to know why clear and direct language is so rare, this book will open your eyes.
In Doublespeak, William Lutz does an excellent job of applying the ideas George Orwell set forth in “Politics and the English Language” to our everyday lives.
In his essay ” Politics and the English Language “, George Orwell observes that political language serves to distort and obfuscate reality.
Doublespeak by William D. Lutz
Retrieved from ” https: From to Lutz edited the, now defunct, Quarterly Review of Doublespeak. Aug 20, Jacquie South rated it really liked it. Refresh and try again.