José Enrique Rodó, Ariel, The title of José Enrique Rodó’s essay comes from William Shakespeare’s play, The Tempest, though the sections about the. Ariel: José Enrique Rodó: considered to be his masterpiece, Ariel (), Rodó set forth his moral credo. Concerned with patterns of human life and with both. Donor challenge: Your generous donation will be matched 2-to-1 right now. Your $5 becomes $15! Dear Internet Archive Supporter,. I ask only.
|Published (Last):||10 June 2010|
|PDF File Size:||12.64 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||13.96 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Brian rated it liked it May 13, Rodo, influenced by Plato, Renan, and a host of other authors fodo are constantly referencedsets his work in a Latin American classroom, where the ennrique teacher urges his young students to pursue idealism and excellence over materialism and utilitarianism.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Table of contents Foreword by James W. He believed both of these embody a sense of beauty, and most important, both realms recognize the significance of devoting oneself to an activity of the mind.
Ultimately, the society that he advocates for though this is clearly stated only once is one in which artistic and creative endeavors rovo valued and in which everyone is offered equal opportunities for success with the full knowledge that each individual will take a different path – a society that seems to me like it would be pretty alright!
Nevertheless, he has this against the USA: Francis of AssisiSchillerand Guyau. So I was reading it decontextualized from the basis of approach that the printers and translators were presenting it towards.
In his configuration, he is himself the wizened Prospero, the old man — what President Obama would probably call the adult in the room — who observes the power play between dirty, opportunistic Caliban the United States and Ariel Latin Americathe boyish, artistic spirit whose idealism and altruism will ultimately allow him to triumph over the former.
His argument for a new Latin America is also based on a visionary idea of its youth and its people as representing an as-yet-realized future society.
Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Return to Book Page. You are commenting using your Twitter account.
José Enrique Rodó
Adrienne rated it really liked it Oct 16, Este ensayo es realmente alentador. Lucas Esandi rated it really liked it May 11, Oct 05, Paul A. Had some interesting parts, but mostly not worth the time. The utilitarian searches and inquires, but in order to use, not in order to understand for appreciation, for contemplation.
José Enrique Rodó – Wikipedia
It is a good book. The problem with the U. According to him, art is only ever made in the U. Spanish Wikisource has original text related to this article: The book is an extended monologue delivered by a teacher to his pupils.
Ariel belongs enroque the movement known aridl modernismocharacterized by its elegance, artistic prose, and worldly references and allusions. The nature of the enriqje is contemplative and philosophical. Email required Address never made public. Diana rated it liked it Sep 02, This landmark essay by Jose Rodo is not easy-reading, but its message is profound, and as relevant, if not more so, today as it was in the year Oct 13, David Renderos rated it it was ok.
His polemic against the United States is considered and informed. Home Contact Us Help Free delivery worldwide. Refresh and try again. I’m about ready to burn it. I read this book three times for three different graduate classes. Line one, page one of the prologue, by Carlos Fuentes: Review quote “‘Ariel,’ like Arnold’s ‘Culture and Anarchy’ and Emerson’s ‘American Scholar,’ is a key text in the longstanding debate concerning culture and democratization.
In ArielProspero’s seminar includes both famous and lesser-known European authors. jise
Recounting how analysts of late-nineteenth-century democracy have widely identified this problem, the speaker does not, he says, want to argue for the complete abandonment of democracy.
Views Read Edit View history.